Quote audit · the canonical guide
How to read a solar quote.
Updated May 22, 2026. Sources verified the same day. We rerun this guide every quarter against the IRS, EIA, LBNL, and NREL reference pages.
A residential solar proposal is a deceptively short document for the size of the commitment it represents. Six pages, two pricing columns, a glossy production chart, a payback figure delivered with the confidence of a Bloomberg quote. Most of it is window dressing. Five numbers decide whether the math holds up — and one isn't on the page at all.
Here's where each one lives, what it really says, and where it tends to mislead. This is the reading guide; the companion calculator runs the audit once the numbers are circled. Footnotes verified against the primary source on May 22, 2026.
Circle these six lines
- 1. System size — circle the kW DC figure, not the panel count.
- 2. Cash price — circle it, then divide by watts in the margin.
- 3. Production — circle the year-1 kWh number.
- 4. Payback — circle the year, then the escalator assumption beneath it.
- 5. Tax credit — circle the install-completion date, not the signature date.
- 6. Hidden number — write in the cash-only price; it may not appear in print.
Sample quote anatomy
1. The system size, in kilowatts DC
Usually labeled something like "System Size: 8.4 kW DC" on the first page. Kilowatts DCis the panel-side rating — the sum of every panel's nameplate watts, divided by 1,000. A proposal might also list a kilowatts ACfigure, which is the inverter-side maximum after conversion losses. Both numbers matter, but the cost-per-watt comparison anyone hands you (yours, the salesperson's, ours) is computed off the DC number.
Where it misleads:system size is a function of your roof and your usage, not the installer's preference. Oversized systems pad commission and may push generation past what your utility's net-metering policy actually credits at retail rate. Undersized systems leave bill savings on the table. Berkeley Lab's 2023 sample1 shows the national median residential install landed at 7.4 kW — useful only as a reference point. The right answer for your home depends on what your meter actually pulls each year.
2. The cost per watt — cash basis
Take the cash price (we'll get to the financed price separately) and divide by the DC system size in watts. An 8.4 kW DC system at $31,800 cash comes out to $3.79/W. That's the single cleanest cost comparator anyone can hand you. Berkeley Lab's Tracking the Sun 2024 report1 documents 2023 state-level median residential installed prices ranging from $3.20/W to $5.20/W — a $2/W band that varies by state, system size, contractor, and market conditions.
Where it misleads:a $/W figure outside the band isn't automatically wrong, but it earns a question. Below $3.20 — verify the cash price isn't omitting permitting, inspection, or interconnection fees. Above $5.20 — earn the price (steep roof, complex install, premium equipment, high-cost state) or negotiate.
3. The annual production estimate
Stated in kilowatt-hours per year. Something like "Estimated annual production: 10,900 kWh."Two useful tests. First, divide by your system's DC kW to get kilowatt-hours per installed kilowatt — call it production per kW. For 10,900 kWh on an 8.4 kW system, that's 1,298 kWh/kW. Second, compare against NREL's PVWatts2for your ZIP, roof azimuth, and tilt — that's the canonical estimator. For most US residential locations PVWatts lands between 1,000 and 1,600 kWh/kW annually at its default 14% system-losses assumption.
Where it misleads:if a proposal's production lands more than 10–15% above PVWatts for your specific site, the salesperson has assumed either ideal orientation, low shading, or lower-than-default system losses. Each is testable. Note also that PVWatts cannot see your particular trees, chimneys, or future neighbors — the inflated estimate could be honest modeling that's still wrong on your roof.
4. The payback claim
Usually shown as a single confident number: "Payback: 7.2 years." It's the year your accumulated bill savings cross your net system cost. Underneath that one number sit three assumptions, each of which moves the headline year significantly: your annual production estimate (covered above), your current utility rate (look at your last bill), and an assumed annual utility-rate escalator — typically 3–5% compounded for 25 years.
Where it misleads: recent EIA data3 shows U.S. residential rates rose 10.2% year over year through March 2026 — higher than most proposal escalators — but the 10-year trend is closer to 2–3%. Both directions of error are real. If you rerun the payback math with a conservative escalator (2.5%) and an aggressive one (5%) and the headline year shifts by more than two, the original number was a forecast resting on a guess.
5. The tax credit assumption
Usually buried under the net cost figure: "After 30% federal tax credit: $22,260." Read this line as carefully as the cash price. The federal Residential Clean Energy Credit (§25D) ended for systems placed in service after December 31, 2025 per the IRS Form 5695 (2025) instructions4. A 2025 federal law change set that placed-in-service deadline; installations completed in 2026 or later no longer qualify for the residential credit.
Where it misleads: "placed in service" means installation is fully complete — not the day you signed, not the day a deposit cleared, not the day a permit was pulled. A contract signed in 2025 with installation slipping into 2026 doesn't qualify. If your proposal still bakes in the 30% on a 2026 install, ask which section of the Internal Revenue Code authorizes it. The credit is also non-refundable — you need income tax owed to claim it. A retired homeowner with $4,000 of annual tax liability cannot use a $9,540 credit in a single year (carryforward helps, but slows the math).
The sixth number — the one that's not on the page
If you're being shown a financed price — total of all loan payments — alongside the cash price, the gap between them is the sixth number, and it's the most quietly informative figure in the document. Berkeley Lab's own language1 says loan-financed solar prices "likely include dealer fees, adding anywhere from 5–50% to the total up-front price paid by the customer." The financed price isn't just the cash price plus loan interest. It often containsa dealer fee baked into the cash quote, and the loan's headline APR is the mechanism that funds it.
How to test it:ask for the cash-only price separately, divide each by your DC system size, and compare $/W. If the financed price comes out 15–35% higher per watt, you're inside LBNL's documented dealer-fee range. Past 50% and you're past the documented upper bound — ask the loan provider directly for a breakdown of fees versus interest.
When the reading is done, run the audit
Reading is the job above; running the numbers is a separate job. The solar quote calculator takes each threshold cited here and tests it against your specific figures — LBNL state median for $/W, PVWatts range for production, the §25D placed-in-service check, and the dealer-fee gap if there's a financed price sitting next to the cash price. About ten minutes start to finish, proposal in hand.
Put three answers in writing
Three questions, each grounded in the numbers above. Read the answers carefully — they're where the math becomes a contract.
- What's the cash-only price? Not financed monthly. Not after-credit. The number you would write on a check tomorrow, with no loan. Then ask for an itemization: equipment, labor, permitting, interconnection, sales tax. The line items reveal whether the installer is even configured to quote on a cash basis — many financed-volume sellers aren't.
- What annual utility-rate escalator did the payback model assume — and where did that number come from? Acceptable answers: the installer's spreadsheet default, your utility's recent published rate cases, EIA data for your state. Unacceptable: a shrug.
- Does the proposal still subtract a 30% federal tax credit — and which section of the Internal Revenue Code authorizes it for your install-completion date? The §25D Residential Clean Energy Credit ended for owned systems placed in service after Dec. 31, 2025. If yours is an owned residential install completing in 2026 or later, the 30% line should be gone. Ask for a revised proposal with the credit removed and the net cost recomputed — in writing.
After the six numbers
Plenty. Roof condition and age. Future shading from trees you haven't planted yet. Inverter clipping under DC oversizing. The qualitative decisions sit in their own guides: net metering vs net billing for how your utility actually credits exported kWh (it can move payback by years); the solar battery calculator for the arbitrage-versus-resilience split; lease vs PPA vs loan vs cash for the ownership-model comparison; and solar sales red flags for the tactics worth walking out on.
- 1. Berkeley Lab, "Tracking the Sun, 2024 Edition" (Executive Summary, August 2024; data through year-end 2023). State-level median residential installed price in 2023 ranged from $3.20/W to $5.20/W; loan dealer-fee gap in financed prices documented as 5–50% of the upfront price paid. Verified 2026-05-16. emp.lbl.gov · Tracking the Sun 2024 (PDF) ↩
- 2. NREL PVWatts (v8) — annual production estimator using NSRDB irradiance data with default 14% system losses. Typical US residential output lands at 1,000–1,600 kWh/kW. Verified 2026-05-16. pvwatts.nrel.gov ↩
- 3. EIA Electric Power Monthly, Table 5.6.A — Average Price of Electricity to Ultimate Customers by End-Use Sector. March 2026 residential average: 18.83 ¢/kWh, +10.2% year over year. 10-year residential rate trend: ~2–3% per year. Released 2026-05-21. Verified 2026-05-22. eia.gov/electricity/monthly ↩
- 4. IRS Form 5695 (2025) instructions, verbatim: "You can't claim residential clean energy credits for expenditures made after December 31, 2025." The One Big Beautiful Bill Act, signed July 4, 2025, terminated §25D for systems placed in service after that date. Verified 2026-05-22. irs.gov/instructions/i5695 ↩
Next — circled the six? Take the marked-up proposal to the solar quote calculator. Each line returns a verdict against the thresholds cited here.